Nevada Enemies
I said: Indict Support Enforcers for the Crime of Peonage, 18 U.S.C. §1581
I did not say, Shoot 'Em!!!!
See the War Posters page for more of these.
The Wikipedia Darren Mack page which seems to keep up to date information.
A good public policy reason for prohibiting peonage and extortion is that those being extorted sometimes react badly.
The Department of Human Resources Welfare Division operates the child support enforcement program.
The District Attorneys bring contempt actions.
Carson City District Attorney enforces child support.
Churchill County District Attorney's Child Support Unit brings the contempt actions.
Clark County District Attorney's Family Support Division brings the contempt actions. On their Frequently Asked Questions page, they admit to practicing peonage in that "The Court will order him or her to find a job". That is what peonage is, a legal requirement to be employed based upon a debt or obligation, 42 U.S.C. §1994. To impose such an order is a crime, 18 U.S.C. §1581.
Esmeralda County District Attorney
Eureka County District Attorney brings contempt actions.
Humboldt County District Attorney's Child Support Division brings the contempt actions.
Lander County District Attorney does NOT handle child support cases. That task is left to the state's Department of Human Resources Welfare Division in this county. I wonder if he just refuses, who can blame him given the Antipeonage Act, or the people of his county won't let him, or he simply has not the budget. Please see the Arizona Enemies page for county prosecutors who are no longer handling child support cases, and read why that might be, the Idaho Enemies page has more information on that subject. Nevada has too much federally funded employment, and perhaps (tee-hee!) alien funded employment, (please don't giggle too much if you are in a work cubicle), to be quite like the other western states in this regard. But Lander County apparently does not!
Lincoln County District Attorney brings the contempt actions. Lincoln County includes the infamous Area 51. Groom Lake is on the Lincoln County side of the county line bordering with Nye County on Nellis Air Force Base. Some maps show the dry lakebed with the name Emigrant Valley. Perhaps we have visitors, "emigrants", there who have come from trillions of miles away. More likely, a bunch of top secret military programs, including experimental aircraft flown from the runway built across the Groom Lakebed, perhaps including flying saucers. The stealth aircraft were developed here. There is the Threat Training Facility, which uses foreign made weapons. Most of these weapons come from Earth. Perhaps a few from elsewhere. The local transit authority uses busses with the windows painted black. Of course, nobody is allowed on the base without a pass, not even visitors from another planet. Then again, the visitors from another planet may not be allowed OFF the base without a pass, and they can never seem to get a pass!
Lyon County District Attorney brings the contempt actions.
Mineral County District Attorney brings the contempt actions.
Nye County District Attorney brings the contempt actions. This is the famous Kingdom of Nye, where Art Bell operates (when he is not retired) his Coast to Coast broadcasts from Pahrump. On the Nye County part of Nellis Air Force Base, we used to shoot off so many nuclear bombs, the tests were a tourist attraction. People would camp out along the ridges overlooking the test site and watch the mushroom clouds rise from the desert floor. As a result of the underground testing, which tended to cause the ground above to collapse down and form a crater or sinkhole, the Yucca Flat is no longer so flat. If you buy the Topo USA mapping software from DeLorme, you will see these craters faithfully rendered in the 3-D mode, all over the Yucca Not-so-flat. It looks like the surface of a golf ball. Groom Lake, popularly known as Area 51, is located just over the county line in Lincoln County. Of course, nobody is allowed on base without a pass, not even Art Bell.
Pershing County District Attorney brings the contempt actions.
The Washoe County District Attorney's Civil Division brings contempt actions.
On June 17, 2006, Washoe County Family Court Judges Charles McGee and Scott Jordan released this statement following the shooting of Judge Charles Weller in the Family Courthouse in Reno, just across the Truckee River from the Virginia Street casino district:
“In our opinion, accompanying the
near absolute right we have to speak freely is a moral duty to exercise that
right responsibility. And we are concerned that the extensive media coverage of
this week’s tragic events in Reno also resulted in the wide dissemination of
several comments about Judge Weller that were written by people with
questionable motives.
Publicizing such unsubstantiated opinions does a disservice to Judge Weller and
does not meet the fairness test.
In addition, giving a legitimate venue to those comments gives credibility to
anonymous, one-sided, and emotion-fueled tirades which deserve none and can
easily inspire others who are disgruntled with a divorce settlement to decide
that taking matters in their own hands is acceptable. It is not.
Between us, we have more than 40 years combined experience in family law
matters, and we both spent many years as Family Court judges. Over the course of
our tenures on the bench, we each received numerous pieces of hate mail and
threats, both subtle and direct. Even if we knew the authors, ethical restraints
prevented us from doing anything other than reporting the threats to the
authorities. We dare say that our experience is no different from the experience
of any other Family Court Judge in this state or, indeed, in this country.
Family Court judges draw the ire of some people who are incapable of thinking
objectively because of the pressures of divorce and custody matters.
Unfortunately, in family court cases, people are often angry. Most such cases
can be settled rationally, but in others, one party is very angry and emotional
and cannot get beyond their anger.
That is why family court judges are under such risk...the angry party blames the
judge. Women may say the judge is biased against women, and men will claim that
the judge is biased against men. The job of a family court judge is tough, and
as a community we need to do everything in our power to ensure the safety of
those judges. What happened to Judge Weller is inexcusable and should not be
used to generate a discussion of his or any other judge’s judicial performance.
Family Courts are to courthouses what emergency rooms are to hospitals, and the
hostility often directed at Family Court judges can be considerable. We
appreciate this opportunity to discuss the unique stresses faced by family court
judges — and some jurists ever more at risk — the Family Court Masters — and we
all wish our colleague, Judge Chuck Weller, a speedy recovery."
Source: http://news.rgj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060617/NEWS01/606170342/1002
Apparently these Family Court judges do not believe in the First Amendment they are sworn to uphold, and would oppose the hosting of this website.
Meanwhile, over at legalreader.com Darren Mack posted his commentary on the More Bad Judges blog covering his fugitive status, posting from an I.P. address within Mexico. As reported on June 23, 2006, Darren wrote:
Here is the real numbers as was given to me in documents by Darren himself. Don´t let the fancy BS done by the attorneys fool you in the court motions. Remember most if not all has been falsely documented. I saw the real financial and bank records myself.
The order said¨.
44,000 income
15,000 income taxes that no-one remembered that had to be taken out. Remember income taxes?
-------------
29,000 left after taxes
10,000 spousal support as per Weller´s order
-------------
19,000 left after spousal support
14,000 all those items that were listed on the order by Weller but not put into dollars. Just the 2 morgages were 9,000 a month. I have seen the bank records.
-------------
5000 left after paying all the bills ordered to be paid by Weller.
849 child support for one child
1000 child support to the previous wife for another child.
-------------
3151 left after child support
6000 in interest paymts and other expences that Weller did not address in his order but had to be paid. Can´t tell the bank Weller said I don´t have to pay.
-------------
-2849 left after bills that must be paid that Weller did not address.
15000 a month for attys fees to fund a war that he tried to settle many times rather than go BK.
-------------
-17,849 left after attys fees. Remember Darren has yet to spend $1 on rent, food, gas, car, support one child full time that lived with him and one child that lived with him half time.
6000 a month for all the above. Darren had a minus cashflow of$-23,849 per month
based on Judge Weller´s order. Live with that for 2 years!! and see if you need to file BK. Get a grip people.
So here it is in simple form. Weller a man making $44,000 a month to pay $61,849 before he got $1 to live on himself and to take care of his children when they lived with him. You make your own conclusion of fairness.
Remember criminals like Charla´s atty Shawn Meador and bought and paid for Judges can make anything look reasonable in court docs. The real test is how does it play out when you have to write the check and balance the checkbook. Don´t be fooled by the surface level BS. I have seen the bank records.
Posted by: mark at June 21, 2006 07:53 PM
And a few hours later he wrote:
That is just one order. The first financial order that was posted is just one of 20 or more things that were Nazi like against Darren. By the way anyone who understands the law would know that he couldn't appeal until the entire case was finished including custody and the divorce decree issues. That is why those two things were stratigically put off by Shawn Meador into the future so as to keep Darren from any protection from another court. It is my understanding that he was in the middle of an emergency writ but those are very rarely issued.
They make up rules and they are the umpires so when they are crooked like in this case one has absolutely no chance at coming out without being robbed broke, put into BK, jailed, extorting the people around you, and then kidnapping your children. There is one place where one has no constitutional rights and that is in the 4 walls of the divorce court. It is just legalized organized crime.
It was not just with Darren but read fatherunite.org and you will see hundreds of stories of the crimes that divorce industry are inflicting on mostly men thoughtout this country. They are plain out crimes. Read them and weep for crimes being waged against mostly men in this country.
Posted by: Mark at June 22, 2006 11:11 AM
Now if you will look at the More Bad Judges blog itself, you will notice a distinct change in the tone of the comments posted after people had a look at these numbers. If a court order requires payments beyond what a man can reasonably make from his income, the courts, meaning judges and their clerks and bailiffs, fail to or refuse to do the math, ignoring detailed accountings of the budget, income, and expenses, presented by the man's attorney, then we have a court order with which compliance is impossible.
DUH!!!!!!!
Therefore, it is no surprise that the math we are now doing is: 250 grains at 4,000 feet per second = severe chest pains!
The Wikipedia Darren Mack page which seems to keep up to date information.
Darren Mack pled guilty. But here is what the jurors had to say about Judge Weller after watching his testimony. They did say that while Judge Weller is a jerk, he did not deserve to get shot. I say, walk a mile in our moccasins, and then determine why so many American revolutionaries, including John Adams and Tom Jefferson, felt tyrants should die. Why the Virginia State flag shows a prone figure and the motto "Sic Semper Tyrannis".
I believe Mack should have gone ahead and presented his case. And then appealed. Why? Because Judge Weller had no way of knowing who shot him and if he was as honest as the witness oath requires him to be, he would have admitted that Darren Mack is not the only person with a motive to shoot him. Some of that testimony should not have been allowed as prejudicial.
A good public policy reason for prohibiting peonage and extortion is that those being extorted sometimes react badly.
Now that this unfortunate event happened, I can safely say the following as a constitutionally protected after the fact commentary:
We tried the 14th Amendment, pleading our case to the state courts. We tried the 5th Amendment, pleading our case to the federal courts. We pled our rights under the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 13th, 14th, and 24th Amendments.
We pled our right to not be targeted by bills of attainder and ex post facto laws.
We pled our right under the 14th Amendment to equal protection of state constitutions that prohibit imprisonment for debt.
We pled the Antipeonage Act, slavery for debt is illegal.
We tried the 1st Amendment, telling our story to an indifferent public.
What Amendment does that leave?
White Pine County District Attorney's Child Support office brings the contempt actions.
Not an enemy, but friends: www.nevadansforequalparenting.org
They gamble that we will never bring the Antipeonage Act to the light of day! Are the odds always in their favor on that bet? Unlike the alien technology at Area 51, the Antipeonage Act is REAL. Here is my comment on the whole Area 51 phenomenon.
Right on this state's flag are the words "Battle Born". This is because Nevada entered the Union as a state during the Civil War. The gold and silver from the Comstock Lode helped finance the Union War effort. Regiments raised in California marched through Nevada to join the fighting in New Mexico Territory, and in the other states and territories west of the Mississippi River. But as Abraham Lincoln complained that what protected slavery was a thick layer of money, so it protects this modern manifestation of peonage. Nevada was spared the carnage of the Civil War, except for those Nevadans who went to war. Will the people of Nevada remember, by looking upon the words on their flag, the price paid to Hell when fundamental human rights are violated?
Chapter 21 Enforcement of Judgments
Chapter 31 Attachment, Garnishment and Other Remedies
Chapter 31A Enforcement of Child Support
Chapter 123 Rights of Husband and Wife
Chapter 123A Premarital Agreements
Chapter 125 Dissolution of Marriage
Chapter 125A Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act
Chapter 125B Obligation of Support
Chapter 125C Custody and Visitation
Chapter 125D Uniform Child Abduction Prevention Act
Chapter 128 Termination of Parental Rights
Chapter 130 Interjurisdictional Enforcement of Support
Chapter 201 Crimes Against Public Decency and Good Morals The obscenity and flag desecration provisions clearly violate Article I Section 9 and the First Amendment. The nonsupport provisions clearly violate Article I Sections 14 and 17, the Thirteenth Amendment and the Antipeonage Act..
Article I Section 1 of the Nevada Constitution declares inalienable rights, including the right to acquire, possess, and protect property. To assert this against the Family Courts is to make "such unsubstantiated opinions" and "one-sided, and emotion-fueled tirades" which deserve no credibility and the publicizing of which "does a disservice to Judge Weller and does not meet the fairness test."
Article I Section 6 of the Nevada Constitution prohibits excessive fines and bails and cruel and unusual punishments. To assert this against the Family Courts is to make "such unsubstantiated opinions" and "one-sided, and emotion-fueled tirades" which deserve no credibility and the publicizing of which "does a disservice to Judge Weller and does not meet the fairness test."
Article I Section 9 of the Nevada Constitution reads:
Liberty of speech and the press. Every citizen may freely speak, write and publish his sentiments on all subjects being responsible for the abuse of that right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all criminal prosecutions and civil actions for libels, the truth may be given in evidence to the Jury; and if it shall appear to the Jury that the matter charged as libelous is true and was published with good motives and for justifiable ends, the party shall be acquitted or exonerated.
If you don't like what people say about you Judges, feel free to bring a civil action for libel!! Fact of libel is a jury question!!
Article I Section 11 of the Nevada Constitution provides every citizen with the right to keep and bear arms for security and defense, and for lawful hunting and recreational use, and for other lawful purposes. Look at what happens when they do!!! And then the Family Court judges violate their rights as set forth in the Nevada Constitution!!!
Article I Section 14 of the Nevada Constitution prohibits imprisonment for debt except in cases of fraud, libel and slander. I guess child support is a fraud. To assert this against the Family Courts is to make "such unsubstantiated opinions" and "one-sided, and emotion-fueled tirades" which deserve no credibility and the publicizing of which "does a disservice to Judge Weller and does not meet the fairness test."
Article I Section 17 of the Nevada Constitution prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude. To assert this against the Family Courts is to make "such unsubstantiated opinions" and "one-sided, and emotion-fueled tirades" which deserve no credibility and the publicizing of which "does a disservice to Judge Weller and does not meet the fairness test."
I once worked out an imprisonment for debt argument for Nevada. I include it on a web page to illustrate the lack of respect for the law and the English language in which it is written by the Nevada courts. Because of the political climate, I am afraid that presented by itself, an imprisonment for debt argument has zero chance of success, a tiny chance if applied to a specific situation. However, if combined with an argument pleading the Antipeonage Act, the chance of success is greater, because you are offering the courts and the bureaucracy a choice: Give me the state constitution, or I will keep pushing the Antipeonage Act, ultimately to demand enforcement of the CRIMINAL provision, 18 U.S.C. §1581!
This is why I like the Antipeonage Act. It cuts through this Gordian Knot of non-law like Alexander's Sword. Somebody in Nevada ought to try it. Do it in a small population county where the local newspaper will cover it. Do it in Washoe County!
Feel free to e-mail me at rogerwknight@hotmail.com with any information that you have to share.
If the back button does not take you there, click Home to go to the Index page of this Antipeonage Act Website, click Enemies for the main Enemies page, click Letters for the Letters page, and click Allies for the Allies page. Or you can use the Antipeonage Act Site Map.