Support Enforcement Justice Files
We WON Court of Appeals No. 58250-0!! Now reported at 174 P. 3d 1198. Further details at the bottom of Writ of Prohibition Against Contempt Prosecution web page!
Some Practical Advice for Support Contemnors in the State of Washington.
A Way to Walk a Mile in a Noncustodial Parent's Moccasins.
Please check out the litigation listed toward the bottom of the web page Knight v. State Writ of Prohibition Against Contempt Prosecution where I was forced to file a Motion to Modify Commissioner's Decision citing Antipeonage Act because the State of Washington imposed a court order that is a direct violation of the Antipeonage Act, requiring me to maintain at least 30 hours of work per week or make 3 job contacts. Therefore, I display my Brief of Appellant because this is an issue of extreme public importance for which the public should be aware.
My latest Reply Brief of Appellant provides the answers to California's Moss v. Superior Court, the Ninth Circuit's Ballek, and Hawaii's new Child Support Enforcement Agency v. Doe, No. 24457, (Hawaii, December 27, 2005) 109 Hawaii 240, 125 P. 3d. 461, each an obscenity against the Rule of Law.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court is considered filed as of the date I mailed it, August 8, 2007, within 90 days of June 6, 2007. It is docketed as No. 07-184.
One analogy to illustrate the absurdity of the proposition that choice of employer avoids finding of involuntary servitude is with Washington's Death Penalty statute, RCW 10.95.180(1) grants the condemned a choice: lethal injection or hanging. No one seriously argues that merely because the condemned has a choice in his demise, there is no death penalty. However, California's Moss v. Superior Court, the Ninth Circuit's Ballek, and Hawaii's Doe uses this precise logic: if the peon has a choice of employer, there is no involuntary servitude!
Patently absurd, of course!
For their sponsorship of Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox Sucker's www.paykids.com his Paykids Foundation, boycott the listed sponsors, including Art Van Furniture, Meijer Stores, Michigan State Medical Society (warning, the MSMS website does not like to let you out when you click the back button), SBC Communications, and Michigan Health and Hospital Association and tell them why you are boycotting them! Go to the Michigan Enemies of Freedom Page and read letters by Stan Rains and Terry Lear for more information as to why, and read Domino's Pizza, Inc.'s letter to me in response to my concerns about PayKid's use of Domino's Pizza gift certificates as a prize in their loathsome Billboard contest, which was CANCELLED!!
Not to be outdone, we are announcing our own billboard contest!
C Level Enterprises is to be commended for their courage, unlike Borders, in distributing father Kevin Thompson's book, "Exposing the Corruption in the Massachusetts Family Courts" in the face of Judge Mary McCauley Manzi's court order prohibiting its distribution. More on this at the Massachusetts Enemies of Freedom webpage. FathersUnite.org has a link to this page.
Restraining order overturned on appeal. Book is now available at Lulu.
The purpose of these Support Enforcement Justice Files is the same as www.justicefiles.org
We just do it with those involved with these on-going crimes of peonage. Lists of State and County Employees are available at www.lbloom.net
www.crimetime.com and with links to many free search resources including Black Book Online and the excellent Phone Validator Our enemies use this, we can too.
Super Pages telephone lookup is good for listed telephone numbers
They changed the Washington Courts Superior Court search engine! But give it a try anyway! Search by litigant's name
Sound Politics Voter Database Look 'em up! Did they vote or did they not and at what address are they registered at?
Want to look at your house from the sky? Microsoft's local.live.com is a real good resource! So are Google Maps Yahoo! Maps www.topozone.com and terrazone-usa.com
Within the State of Washington the federal government has local offices of the United States Department of Human and Health Services Administration of Children and Families, Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) These offices include the Seattle Regional Office. Located at 2201 Sixth Avenue, Blanchard Plaza, Suite 600, Seattle, Washington 98121-1827
This agency lists its Region 10 staff here. Those listed as being on the Child Support Enforcement Team with the Seattle Area Code 206 in their office telephone numbers are:
Carl Christensen a very common name
Levi Fisher, Child Support Program Specialist for Idaho and Washington Two Levi Fishers voted by absentee on November 2, 2005 which one is this guy?
Linda L. M. Gillett, Team Leader, also Alaska and Oregon, DOB August 14, 1946, Newcastle, Washington 98056 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted on August 21, 2007
Roberta Catherine Harrison, Child Support Program Assistant for Public Inquiries and Complaints, imagine the shit she catches every day! DOB December 22, 1952 Seattle, Washington 98122 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted on March 13, 2007 King County District Court East Division (North East District) No. 98-011362 defendant civil goods and services; King County District Court West Division (Seattle) No. Y0-002628 defendant civil goods and services; King County District Court East Division (Issaquah) No. Y2-30731R defendant civil non-sufficient funds check;
Vincent W. Herberholt, Regional Program Manager, Seattle, Washington 98115 DOB April 22, 1951 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted on August 21, 2007
Jan Jensen, Child Support Program Specialist Tribal,
Sandra Lee a very common name
George A. Lund, Child Support Program Specialist for Public Inquiries, Auburn, Washington 98002 DOB September 25, 1953 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on August 21, 2007 King County No. 97-2-12957-5 plaintiff unlawful detainer; King County No. 97-9-10167-6 judgment creditor;
David Thomas, Child Support Program Assistant for Financial Support and Data
Other personnel with Region 10 include:
Stephen S. Henigson, Regional Administrator, shenigson@acf.hhs.gov Bellevue, Washington 98006 DOB December 31, 1946 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted on February 7, 2006 King County District Court East Division (Issaquah) No. C00003788 criminal non-traffic;
Michael A. Nichols, Special Agent Investigated Robert Nowinski for federal child support crime under 18 U.S.C. §228, charge filed as United States v. Nowinski, W.D. Wash. No. 05-520M. The prosecutors of record are Assistant United States Attorneys Jeff C. Sullivan, WSBA 3655 and Douglas Belt Whalley, WSBA 4625. One interesting thing about the Complaint is that while it lists the charge as both felony and misdemeanor, it is an Information based on an Affidavit of Probable Cause by Mike Nichols, not a Grand Jury Indictment which is required under the Fifth Amendment for capital and otherwise infamous crime and by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(a) for a felony.
I cannot resist commenting on this. The federal authorities seem to be careful to prosecute only rich guys under 18 U.S.C. §228. Whenever poor guys are prosecuted, aside from 13th Amendment and Antipeonage Act considerations, there are proof problems with capability of making the child support payments and therefore the element of willfulness of nonpayment when the defendant is some blue collar schmo who was clobbered in a patently unfair divorce. If they have to go to a petit jury for trial as in the case of any felony charge, even if Ballek let them off the hook for jury trial in misdemeanor child support cases in federal court, a jury might prove unduly sympathetic to such a guy.
A Grand Jury might hit upon the idea of indicting those who imposed the child support order for the crime defined by 18 U.S.C. §1581 and upon the federal prosecutors for arresting him with the intent of placing or returning him to such condition! Please see my open letter to Judge Gonzalez for a clue as to how that might happen! This might explain why they prefer to do these kinds of misdemeanors by information!
But with a rich guy like Robert Nowinski, he can hardly claim peonage. How so? His divorce was King County No. 96-3-01494-3. There was a huge amount of property split between the parties. Still, he was quite well off even after this fleecing. His ability to complain is limited by the contractual nature of his prenuptial agreement, which made her marrying him worth her while. Guys, when you make a promise, you make a promise. Gals, when you make a promise, you make a promise, unless the courts decide it is an unfair promise. He had enough money, that if he put it in safe investments such as Puget Sound Energy stock with its large dividend payments, he could obtain a monthly income sufficient to pay the $5,300.00 child support per month, the taxes on that income, with enough left over to allow him to spend everyday watching ESPN or surfing the Internet. He could have paid cash for a three bedroom house out in Federal Way or away from King County where they are cheaper, and nobody could do squat to him for being lazy.
Frankly, I would not blame any rich guy for doing that, given the way government treats them when they try to be movers and shakers creating jobs. If every rich guy said "Fuck it, I'll just spend the rest of my days in a little house watching TV," not only would there be considerably less federal income taxes collected as they make considerably less income, but enough to meet their basic needs, the effect would be economically DEPRESSING! Imagine the Walton Family shutting down every Wal*Mart and laying everyone off. William Boeing sold his airplane company to people interested in running it for profit. If it weren't for investors willing to put up with the risks and the headaches, there would be no Boeing Company. William Boeing would not have had to care as long as he came out of it with enough cash to meet his needs. Atlas can shrug!
Anyway, Nowinski continued to move and shake. He moved to New York, his first mistake in terms of 18 U.S.C. §228 liability. I am safe from this kind of federal prosecution because I have a Ninth Circuit unpublished memorandum vacating a challenge I made to 18 U.S.C. §228 on the basis that I lack standing due to me and the kids being in the same state. Apparently some of Nowinski's deals turned out to be a little too screwball and he had to file for bankruptcy in New York. In the process he stopped making the child support payments.
And there we are. Now we can condemn Mr. Nowinski, and we can see how he made some dumb decisions. But hey, his ex-wife came out of the divorce with MILLIONS! She does not NEED to collect the child support to adequately provide for her children! I would suggest that Mr. Nowinski make a Troxel v. Granville based challenge to the whole thing on the grounds that where a child support order is UNNECESSARY due to the wealth of the custodial parent, then such an order interferes with the noncustodial parent's fundamental right to make decisions concerning the care of the children, by dictating to him how much money to spend, and therefore violates the Fourteenth Amendment. Please see my pleadings listed on the Knight v. Schmitz, 9th Cir. 01-35459, W.D. Wash. No. C00-1874R where I make this argument.
Mr. Nowinski, I know the judges will not like it. But you're on the hook for a federal misdemeanor, Bub! You might as well plead out every possible defense! Don't worry about pissing off the judges, they are already pissed off! You are the noncustodial, they already don't like you!
That is the problem with bigotry and prejudice in the black robe community.
At least Nowinski would have the advantage of some publicity, however negative.
Feel free to e-mail me at rogerwknight@hotmail.com with any information that you have to share.
If the back button does not take you there, click Home to go to the Index page of this Antipeonage Act Website, click Enemies for the main Enemies page, click Letters for the Letters page, and click Allies for the Allies page, or click Justice Files to get to the Justice Files Home page. Or you can use the Antipeonage Act Site Map.