Washington Enemies of Freedom, Pierce County Justice Files

Pierce County Justice Files

Please check out the litigation listed toward the bottom of the web page Knight v. State Writ of Prohibition Against Contempt Prosecution where I was forced to file a Motion to Modify Commissioner's Decision citing Antipeonage Act because the State of Washington imposed a court order that is a direct violation of the Antipeonage Act, requiring me to maintain at least 30 hours of work per week or make 3 job contacts. Therefore, I display my Brief of Appellant because this is an issue of extreme public importance for which the public should be aware.

My latest Reply Brief of Appellant provides the answers to California's Moss v. Superior Court, the Ninth Circuit's Ballek, and Hawaii's new Child Support Enforcement Agency v. Doe, No. 24457, (Hawaii, December 27, 2005) 109 Hawaii 240, 125 P. 3d. 461, each an obscenity against the Rule of Law.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court is considered filed as of the date I mailed it, August 8, 2007, within 90 days of June 6, 2007. It is docketed as No. 07-184.

One analogy to illustrate the absurdity of the proposition that choice of employer avoids finding of involuntary servitude is with Washington's Death Penalty statute, RCW 10.95.180(1) grants the condemned a choice: lethal injection or hanging. No one seriously argues that merely because the condemned has a choice in his demise, there is no death penalty. However, California's Moss v. Superior Court, the Ninth Circuit's Ballek, and Hawaii's Doe uses this precise logic: if the peon has a choice of employer, there is no involuntary servitude!

Patently absurd, of course!

Return to Main Pierce County Justice Files Page

Lists of State and County Employees are available at www.lbloom.net

www.crimetime.com and its Black Book On-Line page with links to many free search resources, including a link to the Pierce County Superior Court's LINX Search Database. Our enemies use this, we can too.

They changed the Washington Courts Superior Court search engine! But give it a try anyway! For Pierce County Superior Court records it will send you to the Pierce County Superior Court's LINX Search Database. Search by litigant's name

For federal district court filings since 2004, there is Dockets.Justia.com

To judge the judges there is ratethecourts.com

Our Public Disclosure Commission has its Lookyup. More fun for the opposition researcher!

Pierce County Recorder public records search engine. Assessor's Parcel Search.

Superior Court's LINX Search Database. Pierce County Jail Guest List. Superior Court and Jail Calendar List.

For DSHS-DCS employees in Tacoma and Fife, click here

Sound Politics Voter Database Look 'em up! Did they vote or did they not and at what address are they registered at?

Want to look at your house from the sky? Microsoft's local.live.com is a real good resource! So are Google Maps Yahoo! Maps www.topozone.com and terrazone-usa.com

Another weapon in our defense is to file a complaint against an attorney with the Washington State Bar Association. I obtained this Grievance Form in Microsoft Word XP off of their website. You have to look, look, look, for it there, or you can merely click here! Rules of Professional Conduct are here. Rules for the Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct are here. Admission to Practice Rules are here. The Oath as Attorney is set forth here. Complaints against judges in the Washington state courts, (does not cover federal courts) can be filed with the Commission on Judicial Conduct with this form in pdf. The other forms with useful information are listed here. Information on filing a judicial conduct complaint are here. The Canons of Judicial Conduct are here. The Discipline Rules for Judges are here. RCW 2.04.080 sets forth the oath of office of justices of the Supreme Court of Washington. RCW 2.06.085 sets forth the oath of office of office of judges of the Court of Appeals for the State of Washington. RCW 2.08.080 sets forth the oath of office of judges of the superior courts. RCW 2.24.020 sets forth the oath of office of court commissioners. RCW 3.34.080 sets forth the oath of office of district court judges, judges pro tempore, and commissioners.

Allow me to let you in on a dirty little secret here. Consider this: Say you are a judge in Washington's court system. Or any other court system actually, but Washington is the one I am most familiar with. We all know about the incredible and universal gender bias in family law, and the absolute lack of respect for noncustodial parents as human beings. Observing this is like observing that the sky is blue. But it is just not credible that ALL of our judges are THAT BIGOTED. SOMETHING is placing the thumb on the scales of justice here, that is the only explanation that makes sense! And here is what it is: As a judge, you know that if you make a ruling that offends certain elements in our society you will be BORKED! In Washington, there are two primary means of borking a judge. 1) Putting up credible sounding candidates against your re-election when judges who NEED to be removed for their refusal to enforce Constitutional rights of politically incorrect litigants (meaning noncustodials and others) never face a challenger. Judge Jeanette Burrage suffered from that fate, and from her own foolishness in admonishing female attorneys for wearing pantsuits instead of dresses. 2) A campaign of judicial conduct complaints. Justice Richard Sanders has experienced this. Power Structure just does not like his dissents, but what saves him is that he is popular with the voting public, the only thing that comes even close to frightening the Power Structure. Notice I use capital letters. Everyone in Washington smarter and more observant than a doorknob knows we have one, even if we cannot "prove" it. An organization with access to, say, numerous divorce files without having to spend hours at the courthouse looking them up, would be in a perfect position to organize a CAMPAIGN of Judicial Conduct Commission complaints against a judge who pissed them off. Litigants in these divorces unhappy with this particular judge will be happy to fill out and file these complaints when prompted. And because judicial conduct complaints are mostly SECRET, we do not know and cannot verify, if there is ACTUALLY A CAMPAIGN of such complaints against a particular judge. Because every judge is a human being, and therefore not perfect, there will be at least one incident described in these complaints, where the judge messed up bad enough to warrant discipline!

Same thing with lawyers, which might explain their fear of FORCEFULLY representing noncustodial parents and even to mention the Antipeonage Act in the same context as family law.

So what do we do? Answer is to realize that the thumb on the scales of justice is political, and is motivated by some unreasoning hatred of noncustodial parents, and/or the Seven Deadly Sins including avarice (fancy word for greed) and there is only one thing we NEED to do in ADDITION to everything else we do: Put OUR thumb on the other side of the scales of justice.

Judicial Conduct Commission complaints, folks. Bar complaints against support enforcer attorneys. EVERY time they give you cause to file such complaints! Clue: What works are lies, excuse me, "misstatements of fact" ;-), told by attorney to court that were uncorrected and repeated after you asserted that the truth is otherwise. Back it up with evidence. That gets the disciplinary counsel fired up!

Commission on Judicial Conduct new Search page. Look 'em up!

For on line commentary on our judges, there is the Courthouse Forum.

Court of Appeals Division Two Commissioner Mark H. Adams was Forced to Resign by the Commission on Judicial Conduct for being weird. The Stipulation. My objection is with respect to the diary he kept at the SUGGESTION OF A COUNSELOR. So much for doctor-patient privilege and medical privacy. Under this circumstance, a judge dare not keep any diary or undergo any treatment for any mental or psychological condition because such cannot be protected from disclosure to the Commission on Judicial Conduct. The inevitable result will be some of our cases being heard by judges whose mental health issues go UNTREATED.

Pierce County Superior Court

Judges Click here to find the list of Current and former Judges and their litigation histories.

Under Article IV Section 7 of the Washington Constitution, a party to a case in a superior court has to consent in writing before a pro tem judge (with exceptions) can hear his case or render any decision. If a party objects, the pro tem must recuse.

Pro Tempore Judges

Robin H. Balsam, WSBA 14001, Fox Island, Washington 98333 DOB March 21, 1957 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted on November 8, 2005 Did some guardian ad litem King County No. 85-9-17314-2 judgment creditor domestic order modifying decree with attorney's fee of $500.00; King County No. 90-9-01457-1 judgment debtor for $4,874.50 paid; Pierce County No. 85-2-03149-6 defendant quiet title; Pierce County No. 89-2-01279-6 trustee injunction dismissed before trial; Pierce County No. 90-2-09716-7 or 90-2-09716-7 plaintiff collection; Pierce County No. 91-2-07950-1 plaintiff commercial; Pierce County No. 91-2-12984-9 plaintiff collection; Pierce County No. 92-2-01130-7 assignee and plaintiff collection; Pierce County No. 92-2-04988-6 or 92-2-04988-6 plaintiff collection; Pierce County No. 92-2-05621-1 plaintiff collection judgment paid; Pierce County No. 93-2-06119-1 plaintiff collection; Pierce County No. 93-2-06354-2 plaintiff collection; Pierce County No. 93-2-08679-8 plaintiff collection; Pierce County No. 94-2-06384-2 plaintiff tort motor vehicle; Pierce County No. 94-2-07685-5 plaintiff unlawful detainer; Pierce County No. 94-2-07686-3 plaintiff unlawful detainer; Pierce County No. 95-2-00414-3 plaintiff unlawful harassment petition granted without contest; Pierce County No. 96-2-06970-7 plaintiff unlawful detainer; Pierce County No. 96-2-08486-2 plaintiff commercial; Pierce County No. 96-2-14093-2 plaintiff unlawful harassment; Pierce County No. 00-2-07190-1 defendant malpractice; Pierce County No. 00-2-08263-6 plaintiff commercial; Pierce County No. 01-2-08701-6 plaintiff, defendant, and cross defendant malpractice; Pierce County No. 01-2-11233-9 plaintiff medical malpractice; Pierce County No. 02-2-08637-9 plaintiff unlawful detainer; Pierce County No. 03-2-07195-1 plaintiff unlawful detainer; Pierce County No. 03-2-13492-4 plaintiff civil decree of dissolution with guardian ad litem fees of $1,166.66; Pierce County No. 04-2-08134-9 plaintiff civil; Pierce County No. 85-9-00710-8 judgment creditor domestic; Pierce County No. 90-9-00685-0 judgment creditor domestic with guardian ad litem fee of $508.50 paid; Pierce County No. 90-9-08806-6 judgment creditor for $3,143.57 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 91-9-03738-9 judgment creditor domestic with guardian ad litem fee of $132.61; Pierce County No. 91-9-03739-7 judgment creditor domestic with guardian ad litem fee of $257.61; Pierce County No. 91-9-07652-0 judgment creditor for $831.80 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 92-9-00174-9 judgment creditor for $1,669.96; Pierce County No. 92-9-01921-4 assignee and judgment creditor for $1,210.14; Pierce County No. 92-9-05558-0 judgment creditor for $2,609.20; Pierce County No. 92-9-05803-1 judgment creditor for $2,139.48; Pierce County No. 94-9-04695-1 judgment creditor paternity with attorney's fee of $517.00; Pierce County No. 94-9-04696-0 judgment creditor paternity with fee of $32.35; Pierce County No. 94-9-06922-6 judgment creditor regular civil case with attorney's fees and costs of $471.50; Pierce County No. 94-9-06923-4 judgment creditor regular civil case with attorney's fee and costs of $477.10; Pierce County No. 94-9-09778-5 judgment creditor paternity with attorney's fee of $2,042.88; Pierce County No. 95-9-00235-9 judgment creditor regular civil case with attorney's fee of $700.00; Pierce County No. 95-9-02332-1 judgment creditor for $5,007.24; Pierce County No. 95-9-09219-6 judgment creditor for $3,764.84 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 00-9-02613-8 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee and costs of $2,682.48 paid; Pierce County No. 01-9-12471-5 judgment creditor child support with attorney's fee of $350.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 03-9-05153-6 judgment creditor for $1,370.00 and writ of restitution; Pierce County No. 04-9-06753-8 judgment creditor regular civil case; Pierce County No. 04-9-11338-6 judgment creditor guardianship with attorney's fee of $5,442.39;

Charles James Brocato, WSBA 8855, Gig harbor, Washington 98335 DOB August 1, 1944 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Did guardian ad litem work in civil cases Pierce County No. 83-2-02250-4 defendant commercial; Pierce County No. 83-2-04620-2 plaintiff civil; Pierce County No. 85-2-01815-5 defendant personal injury; Pierce County No. 85-2-03473-8 plaintiff quiet title; Pierce County No. 85-2-05926-9 defendant civil; Pierce County No. 87-2-00441-0 defendant and third party plaintiff civil settled; Pierce County No. 87-2-04712-7 defendant property damages; Pierce County No. 90-2-02014-8 defendant civil; Pierce County No. 91-3-02554-1 petitioner dissolution with no children; Pierce County No. 92-9-10401-7 judgment creditor;

Sandra B. Bobrick, WSBA 11359, Gig Harbor, Washington 98335 DOB September 30, 1948 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted on November 8, 2005 Did some guardian ad litem work.

Kevin Michael Boyle, WSBA 11296, Tacoma, Washington 98409 DOB April 14, 1953 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Did guardian ad litem work Pierce County No. 83-2-04197-5 intervenor property damages; Pierce County No. 86-2-02781-1 plaintiff civil; Pierce County No. 89-2-01270-2 involved party civil; Pierce County No. 90-2-05589-8 garnishee defendant personal injury settled; Pierce County No. 91-2-09079-9 plaintiff tort motor vehicle; Pierce County No. 92-2-07820-7 plaintiff tort motor vehicle; Pierce County No. 99-2-07646-5 defendant commercial; Pierce County No. 01-2-14204-1 plaintiff commercial; Pierce County No. 02-2-06982-2 plaintiff commercial; Pierce County No. 02-2-13672-4 plaintiff tort motor vehicle; Pierce County No. 03-2-04338-4 plaintiff commercial; Pierce County No. 03-2-09575-9 defendant tort motor vehicle; Pierce County No. 04-2-14534-7 plaintiff commercial; Pierce County No. 84-9-05953-3 judgment creditor garnishment; Pierce County No. 91-9-03938-1 judgment creditor; Pierce County No. 92-9-05375-7 judgment creditor for $5,753.00; Pierce County No. 93-9-05299-6 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $7,060.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 94-9-02084-7 judgment creditor tort motor vehicle for $10,193.80; Pierce County No. 97-9-06141-6 judgment creditor regular civil case with attorney's fee and costs of $390.98; Pierce County No. 01-9-15731-1 judgment creditor; Pierce County No. 02-9-12629-5 judgment creditor; Pierce County No. 03-9-04689-3 judgment creditor; Pierce County No. 03-9-05496-9 judgment creditor; Pierce County No. 05-9-00860-2 judgment creditor for $29,402.98;

Marc Tracy Christianson, WSBA 5970, University Place, Washington 98467 DOB May 28, 1949 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Pierce County No. 82-2-05568-4 plaintiff transcript of judgment; Pierce County No. 95-2-04636-9 plaintiff unlawful detainer; Pierce County No. 82-9-03036-9 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-04221-5 judgment creditor domestic agreed judgment with attorney's fee of $175.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-06232-5 judgment creditor transcript of judgment for $970.92; Pierce County No. 84-9-01138-7 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $1,812.29; Pierce County No. 85-9-05472-6 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $500.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 86-9-05861-4 judgment creditor with attorneys fee of $2,000.00; Pierce County No. 92-9-09465-8 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $600.00; Pierce County No. 95-9-03843-4 judgment creditor along with client H. Edward Haarmann for $12,032.00; Pierce County No. 98-9-04507-9 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $578.75; Pierce County No. 98-9-04508-7 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $125.00; Pierce County No. 01-9-04611-1 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $3,000.00;

Timothy G. Edwards, WSBA 8268, Puyallup, Washington 98374 DOB February 6, 1952 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004

Patricia Campbell Fetterly, WSBA 8425, Tacoma, Washington 98403 DOB March 23, 1949 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Did some guardian ad litem work. Pierce County No. 98-2-12400-3 defendant tort motor vehicle; Pierce County No. 81-9-01495-1 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $108.75; Pierce County No. 81-9-01499-3 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $165.00;

Joseph Harold Gordon, Jr., WSBA 1804, Tacoma, Washington 98406 DOB July 11, 1939 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005

Henry Haas, WSBA 4435, Tacoma, Washington 98406 DOB April 8, 1938 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Done some guardian ad litem work Pierce County No. 95-2-05837-5 defendant commercial; Pierce County No. 99-3-01720-9 petitioner child custody; Pierce County No. 85-9-04771-1 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $7,500.00;

Debra Kay Hannula, WSBA 13283, Tacoma, Washington 98403 DOB February 2, 1958 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 King County No. 89-9-13877-3 judgment creditor domestic agreed decree of dissolution of her own marriage for $4,500.00 with 9% interest paid; King County No. 90-9-05040-3 judgment creditor domestic her own marriage with $500.00 attorney's fee with 12.22% interest paid; King County No. 90-9-14676-1 judgment creditor domestic her own marriage with $500.00 attorney's fee with 12% interest paid; King County No. 90-9-16584-7 judgment creditor domestic her own marriage with $500.00 attorney's fee with 12% interest paid; King County No. 91-9-04640-4 judgment creditor domestic her own marriage with $500.00 attorney's fee with 12% interest paid; King County No. 91-9-20583-9 judgment creditor domestic order on family law motion in her own marriage with $250.00 attorney's fee with 12% interest paid; King County No. 91-9-25001-0 judgment creditor domestic order adjudicating contempt her own marriage with $1,000.00 attorney's fee with 12% interest paid; King County No. 92-9-00394-1 judgment creditor domestic her own marriage with $1,000.00 attorney's fee with 12% interest paid; King County No. 92-9-04205-9 judgment creditor domestic order on family law motion in her own marriage with $250.00 attorney's fee with 12% interest paid; King County No. 92-9-08304-9 judgment debtor domestic her own marriage with $500.00 attorney's fee with 12% interest; King County No. 92-9-17116-9 judgment creditor domestic garnishment for $1,929.25 of her own ex-husband's money; King County No. 92-9-21446-1 judgment creditor domestic garnishment for $3,129.60 of her ex-husband's money paid; King County No. 93-9-24836-4 judgment creditor domestic her own marriage with Court of Appeals mandate with costs of $216.66 with 12% interest; King County No. 93-9-24837-2 judgment creditor domestic her own marriage with Court of Appeals mandate with attorney's fee and costs totaling $10,367.32 with 12% interest paid; For some reason, the divorce itself is not listed, it is King County No. 88-3-02749-1 She was admitted to the WSBA in 1983, so presumably she could earn a decent living without depending on any money payment from her ex-husband extorted by the courts.

Randall Logan Hansen, WSBA 12901, Tacoma, Washington 98406 DOB July 8, 1954 Did not vote on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Also with the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals Did some guardian ad litem work Pierce County No. 90-2-01616-7 plaintiff personal injury; Pierce County No. 90-2-03903-5 defendant and third party plaintiff collection; Pierce County No. 99-2-12487-7 defendant collection; Pierce County No. 97-3-04452-8 petitioner dissolution with children; Pierce County No. 99-9-11561-0 judgment debtor default judgment for $8,660.03;

Edward Marshall Lane, WSBA 2972, DOB April 7, 1928 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Has since gone to his hearing before the Angels at the Pearly Gates Pierce County No. 89-2-09260-9 plaintiff commercial; Pierce County No. 93-2-04625-7 plaintiff commercial; Pierce County No. 93-2-10456-7 defendant commercial settled; Pierce County No. 82-9-02591-8 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $1,494.67; Pierce County No. 94-9-11017-0 judgment creditor regular civil case for $22,360.46 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 99-9-00835-0 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $350.00; Pierce County No. 99-901225-0 judgment creditor domestic for $20,350.00; Pierce County No. 00-9-11970-5 judgment creditor regular civil case for $47,617.32;

Here is an opportunity to consider a very important constitutional principle, upon which our nation is founded and without which it is in peril. The judgment for $47,617.32 obtained by Mr. Lane in the regular civil case was substantial enough to be worth hiring a lawyer and litigating such claim in the courts. In the regular civil case, a plaintiff has to prove that the defendant did something wrong. Examples would include breach of contract, failure to pay an employee wages earned, or any tort recognizable under the common law or under statute. Without that, the result is a judgment for the defendant. And that is the way it should be, indeed Constitutionally required by the plain language of the Fourteenth Amendment and by the plain language of Article I Section 3 of the Washington Constitution. Any Fourth Grader who passes the Basic Skills Test can figure that out. It is NOT complicated. However, in a divorce or meretricious relationship case, there is no legal requirement for FAULT, I.E. THAT ONE PARTY DID SOMETHING WRONG, RCW 26.09.080, recognized by the Washington Courts for there to be an order requiring one party to pay money to the other party beyond what originally belonged to the other party, nor is there such requirement for an order to pay alimony, RCW 26.09.090, or child support, RCW 26.09.100 (what is meant by the statutory phrase "without regard to marital misconduct") in spite of the clear and plain language of the federal and state Constitutional Due Process Clauses. Example being the judgment for $20,350.00 obtained without any proof that the judgment debtor ever did anything WRONG.

And THAT folks, is THE PROBLEM. That is why our state's courts routinely deny those under orders entered in DOMESTIC RELATIONS cases the equal protection of Article I Section 17 of the Washington Constitution, which prohibits imprisonment for debt, as well as otherwise violating the Equal Protection Clause. As well as violating the 13th Amendment and the Antipeonage Act. Because of course fair minded people raised with the expectations for American freedom and fairness in the American courts as taught in our public and private schools will resist such patently unfair orders which arise without the requirement for PROOF that such parties ever did anything WRONG.

It is NOT complicated.

Without the requirement for finding of WRONGDOING, EVERYTHING THAT FOLLOWS is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and therefore NULL AND VOID.

Robyn Ann Lindsay, WSBA 14743, University Place, Washington 98466 DOB August 13, 1958 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Also serves as a Commissioner Pro Tempore Pierce County No. 98-9-11357-1 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $750.00 with 12% interest;

Elizabeth Pike Martin, WSBA 12940, Tacoma, Washington 98407 DOB October 8, 1957 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005

Terrance F. McCarthy, WSBA 4730, Does not appear to be registered to vote in the State of Washington Pierce County No. 86-2-09889-1 3rd party defendant civil; Pierce County No. 87-2-07587-2 plaintiff civil default judgment; Pierce County No. 89-2-03922-8 plaintiff collection; Pierce County No. 89-2-06990-9 plaintiff commercial; Pierce County No. 81-9-00022-4 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $1,000.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-05076-9 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $650.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-06007-1 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $300.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-03541-3 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $150.00; Pierce County No. 86-9-03915-6 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $150.00; Pierce County No. 87-9-00305-2 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee and costs of $650.00 paid; Pierce County No. 88-9-04739-2 judgment creditor regular civil case for $9,256.80 paid; Pierce County No. 89-9-00407-1 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $350.00 paid; Pierce County No. 89-9-01918-4 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $750.00; Pierce County No. 89-9-01938-9 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $750.00; Pierce County No. 89-9-02141-3 judgment creditor domestic garnishment enforced for $428.30 paid; Pierce County No. 89-9-02522-2 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $250.00; Pierce County No. 89-9-04367-1 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 89-9-04415-4 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $1,000.00; Pierce County No. 89-9-05869-4 judgment creditor regular civil case for $3,164.23 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 90-9-00309-5 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fees totaling $1,000.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 91-9-05127-6 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 91-9-07540-0 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 91-9-07602-3 judgment creditor domestic order on show cause with attorney's fee of $500.00 paid; Pierce County No. 92-9-10942-6 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $1,000.00; Pierce County No. 95-9-00237-5 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and prejudgment interest totaling $1,660.00; Pierce County No. 95-9-01939-1 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $500.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 98-9-06948-2 judgment debtor domestic with attorney's fee (sanctions against attorney in divorce case) of $750.00 paid; Pierce County No. 99-9-00598-9 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $2,500.00 with 12% interest;

Notice a pattern here? Perhaps the destruction of the institution of marriage and the family is more due to the pecuniary interest of those to whom we award bar licenses and elect to political and judicial office than to two people of the same gender wanting to try it. Phyllis Schafly finally noticed this. She noticed it Again. She opposes reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act as the femi-nazi crap that it is.

Bernard William McNallen, WSBA 12106, Does not appear to be registered to vote in the State of Washington.

John Charles Purbaugh, WSBA 19559, Gig Harbor, Washington 98335 DOB May 4, 1951 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Did guardian ad litem work

Joe McNeal Quaintance, WSBA 8177, Puyallup, Washington 98374 DOB February 3, 1951 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Also served as a Commissioner pro tem Did some guardian ad litem work Pierce County No. 01-2-10098-5 defendant commercial; Pierce County No. 83-9-00340-8 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $175.00; Pierce County No. 83-9-03355-2 judgment creditor paternity with guardian ad litem fee of $320.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-03043-8 judgment creditor domestic amended decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $200.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-03884-6 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $1,000.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-04536-2 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $200.00; Pierce County No. 87-9-01141-1 judgment creditor with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 01-9-09571-5 judgment debtor default judgment for $2,212.42 with 15.75%;

Robert David Reinhard, WSBA 10890, Tacoma, Washington 98422 DOB May 13, 1948 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Did some guardian ad litem work

James A. Schoenberger, Jr., WSBA 33603, Tacoma, Washington 98405 DOB March 4, 1948 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005

Former pro tempore judges

Carson Finley Eller, WSBA 1106, Fox Island, Washington 98333 DOB September 3, 1932 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted on February 8, 2005 but has not voted since Listed as "Inactive", probably not performing pro tem commissioner or judge work anymore. Perhaps because he could not afford any more judgments against him! 30 civil cases involving him as a litigant or guardian ad litem in Pierce County Superior Court King County No. 84-9-05359-9 judgment creditor domestic stipulated judgment with attorney's fee of $3,326.59 with 13.97% interest; Kitsap County No. 06-2-00887-3 defendant transcript of judgment judgment paid; Kitsap County No. 84-9-00877-3 judgment debtor for $100.00 in sanctions; Kitsap County No. 06-9-00882-8 judgment debtor transcript of judgment paid; Lewis County No. 83-9-00434-2 judgment debtor mandate from Court of Appeals for costs totaling $1,954.33; Pierce County No. 89-3-03417-3 respondent dissolution; Pierce County No. 81-9-03580-0 judgment creditor domestic order on show cause with attorney's fee of $350.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-00226-8 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $300.00 and lien of $1,200.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-01871-7 judgment creditor regular civil case with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-02454-7 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $1,000.00; Pierce County No. 83-9-06109-2 judgment debtor abstract of judgment regular civil case for $39,811.53; Pierce County No. 84-9-01956-6 judgment creditor domestic agreed order with attorney's fee of $300.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-02900-6 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $150.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-03647-9 judgment creditor; Pierce County No. 84-9-04669-5 judgment debtor regular civil case for $10,602.28; Pierce County No. 85-9-02438-0 judgment creditor transcript of judgment for $959.69; Pierce County No. 86-9-00696-7 judgment debtor abstract of judgment from Lewis County for $1,563.46; Pierce County No. 86-9-01690-3 judgment creditor transcript of judgment for $135.03; Pierce County No. 86-9-01691-1 judgment creditor transcript of judgment for $135.03; Pierce County No. 86-9-01692-0 judgment creditor transcript of judgment for $135.03; Pierce County No. 86-9-05579-8 judgment creditor regular civil case for $14,115.00; Pierce County No. 88-9-00979-2 judgment creditor on remand from Court of Appeals for $187.96 against a citizen who DARED to sue a judge!; Pierce County No. 88-9-02656-5 judgment creditor regular civil case mandate from Court of Appeals for $125.00; Pierce County No. 89-9-00079-3 judgment creditor; Pierce County No. 94-9-11174-5 judgment debtor regular civil case for $500.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 95-9-00862-4 judgment debtor regular civil case for $50,000.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 01-9-06923-4 judgment creditor for $466.27; Snohomish County No. 81-9-05436-0 judgment debtor tax warrants for $615.62 paid; Snohomish County No. 83-9-02506-0 judgment debtor regular civil case for $39,794.53 with interest at 10% paid; Thurston County No. 96-3-01274-3 petitioner dissolution with no children; Thurston County No. 82-9-01461-6 judgment creditor regular civil case attorney's lien for $593.87; Thurston County No. 97-9-00769-3 judgment debtor domestic own divorce for $16,700.00 with 12% interest payable to ex-wife;

Horace G. Geer, WSBA 5944, Tacoma, Washington 98402 Does not appear to be registered to vote in the State of Washington

Gerald Wayne Neil, WSBA 5295, Edgewood, Washington 98372 DOB August 19, 1943 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Involved in 17 civil cases in Pierce County Pierce County No. 81-9-02726-2 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $300.00; Pierce County No. 81-9-02964-8 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $300.00; Pierce County No. 81-9-04524-4 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $263.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-00600-0 judgment creditor domestic order on show cause with attorney's fee of $275.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-06187-6 judgment creditor domestic garnishment enforced for $356.03; Pierce County No. 82-9-06494-8 judgment creditor garnishment enforced for $309.36; Pierce County No. 83-9-00192-9 judgment creditor; Pierce County No. 00-9-12063-1 judgment creditor foreign judgment from the Bankruptcy Court for $217,732.87;

Feel free to e-mail me at rogerwknight@hotmail.com with any information that you have to share.

If the back button does not take you there, click Home to go to the Index page of this Antipeonage Act Website, click Enemies for the main Enemies page, click Letters for the Letters page, click Allies for the Allies page, or click Justice Files to get to the Justice Files Home page. Or you can use the Antipeonage Act Site Map.