Pierce County Justice Files
Antipeonage Act Site Map Justice Files Home Page
We WON Court of Appeals No. 58250-0!! Now reported at 174 P. 3d 1198. Further details at the bottom of Writ of Prohibition Against Contempt Prosecution web page!
Some Practical Advice for Support Contemnors in the State of Washington.
A Way to Walk a Mile in a Noncustodial Parent's Moccasins.
Please check out the litigation listed toward the bottom of the web page Knight v. State Writ of Prohibition Against Contempt Prosecution where I was forced to file a Motion to Modify Commissioner's Decision citing Antipeonage Act because the State of Washington imposed a court order that is a direct violation of the Antipeonage Act, requiring me to maintain at least 30 hours of work per week or make 3 job contacts. Therefore, I display my Brief of Appellant because this is an issue of extreme public importance for which the public should be aware.
My latest Reply Brief of Appellant provides the answers to California's Moss v. Superior Court, the Ninth Circuit's Ballek, and Hawaii's new Child Support Enforcement Agency v. Doe, No. 24457, (Hawaii, December 27, 2005) 109 Hawaii 240, 125 P. 3d. 461, each an obscenity against the Rule of Law.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court is considered filed as of the date I mailed it, August 8, 2007, within 90 days of June 6, 2007. It is docketed as No. 07-184.
One analogy to illustrate the absurdity of the proposition that choice of employer avoids finding of involuntary servitude is with Washington's Death Penalty statute, RCW 10.95.180(1) grants the condemned a choice: lethal injection or hanging. No one seriously argues that merely because the condemned has a choice in his demise, there is no death penalty. However, California's Moss v. Superior Court, the Ninth Circuit's Ballek, and Hawaii's Doe uses this precise logic: if the peon has a choice of employer, there is no involuntary servitude!
Patently absurd, of course!
For their sponsorship of Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox Sucker's www.paykids.com his Paykids Foundation, boycott the listed sponsors, including Art Van Furniture, Meijer Stores, Michigan State Medical Society (warning, the MSMS website does not like to let you out when you click the back button), SBC Communications, and Michigan Health and Hospital Association and tell them why you are boycotting them! Go to the Michigan Enemies of Freedom Page and read letters by Stan Rains and Terry Lear for more information as to why, and read Domino's Pizza, Inc.'s letter to me in response to my concerns about PayKid's use of Domino's Pizza gift certificates as a prize in their loathsome Billboard contest, which was CANCELLED!!
Not to be outdone, we are announcing our own billboard contest!
C Level Enterprises is to be commended for their courage, unlike Borders, in distributing father Kevin Thompson's book, "Exposing the Corruption in the Massachusetts Family Courts" in the face of Judge Mary McCauley Manzi's court order prohibiting its distribution. More on this at the Massachusetts Enemies of Freedom webpage. FathersUnite.org has a link to this page.
Restraining order overturned on appeal. Book is now available at Lulu.
We now have the Antipeonage Act Website Forum, please click the "Enter my Forum" banner!
The purpose of these Pierce County Justice Files is the same as www.justicefiles.org
Lists of State and County Employees are available at www.lbloom.net
www.crimetime.com and with links to many free search resources including Black Book Online, the excellent Phone Validator and a link to the Pierce County Superior Court's LINX Search Database. Our enemies use this, we can too.
Super Pages telephone lookup is good for listed telephone numbers
They changed the Washington Courts Superior Court search engine! But give it a try anyway! For Pierce County Superior Court records it will send you to the Pierce County Superior Court's LINX Search Database. Search by litigant's name
For federal district court filings since 2004, there is Dockets.Justia.com
To judge the judges there is ratethecourts.com
Our Public Disclosure Commission has its Lookyup. More fun for the opposition researcher!
Pierce County Recorder public records search engine. Assessor's Parcel Search.
Superior Court's LINX Search Database. Pierce County Jail Guest List. Superior Court and Jail Calendar List.
For DSHS-DCS employees in Tacoma and Fife, click here
Sound Politics Voter Database Look 'em up! Did they vote or did they not and at what address are they registered at?
Want to look at your house from the sky? Microsoft's local.live.com is a real good resource! So are Google Maps Yahoo! Maps www.topozone.com and terrazone-usa.com
Another weapon in our defense is to file a complaint against an attorney with the Washington State Bar Association. I obtained this Grievance Form in Microsoft Word XP off of their website. You have to look, look, look, for it there, or you can merely click here! Rules of Professional Conduct are here. Rules for the Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct are here. Admission to Practice Rules are here. The Oath as Attorney is set forth here. Complaints against judges in the Washington state courts, (does not cover federal courts) can be filed with the Commission on Judicial Conduct with this form in pdf. The other forms with useful information are listed here. Information on filing a judicial conduct complaint are here. The Canons of Judicial Conduct are here. The Discipline Rules for Judges are here. RCW 2.04.080 sets forth the oath of office of justices of the Supreme Court of Washington. RCW 2.06.085 sets forth the oath of office of office of judges of the Court of Appeals for the State of Washington. RCW 2.08.080 sets forth the oath of office of judges of the superior courts. RCW 2.24.020 sets forth the oath of office of court commissioners. RCW 3.34.080 sets forth the oath of office of district court judges, judges pro tempore, and commissioners.
Allow me to let you in on a dirty little secret here. Consider this: Say you are a judge in Washington's court system. Or any other court system actually, but Washington is the one I am most familiar with. We all know about the incredible and universal gender bias in family law, and the absolute lack of respect for noncustodial parents as human beings. Observing this is like observing that the sky is blue. But it is just not credible that ALL of our judges are THAT BIGOTED. SOMETHING is placing the thumb on the scales of justice here, that is the only explanation that makes sense! And here is what it is: As a judge, you know that if you make a ruling that offends certain elements in our society you will be BORKED! In Washington, there are two primary means of borking a judge. 1) Putting up credible sounding candidates against your re-election when judges who NEED to be removed for their refusal to enforce Constitutional rights of politically incorrect litigants (meaning noncustodials and others) never face a challenger. Judge Jeanette Burrage suffered from that fate, and from her own foolishness in admonishing female attorneys for wearing pantsuits instead of dresses. 2) A campaign of judicial conduct complaints. Justice Richard Sanders has experienced this. Power Structure just does not like his dissents, but what saves him is that he is popular with the voting public, the only thing that comes even close to frightening the Power Structure. Notice I use capital letters. Everyone in Washington smarter and more observant than a doorknob knows we have one, even if we cannot "prove" it. An organization with access to, say, numerous divorce files without having to spend hours at the courthouse looking them up, would be in a perfect position to organize a CAMPAIGN of Judicial Conduct Commission complaints against a judge who pissed them off. Litigants in these divorces unhappy with this particular judge will be happy to fill out and file these complaints when prompted. And because judicial conduct complaints are mostly SECRET, we do not know and cannot verify, if there is ACTUALLY A CAMPAIGN of such complaints against a particular judge. Because every judge is a human being, and therefore not perfect, there will be at least one incident described in these complaints, where the judge messed up bad enough to warrant discipline!
Same thing with lawyers, which might explain their fear of FORCEFULLY representing noncustodial parents and even to mention the Antipeonage Act in the same context as family law.
So what do we do? Answer is to realize that the thumb on the scales of justice is political, and is motivated by some unreasoning hatred of noncustodial parents, and/or the Seven Deadly Sins including avarice (fancy word for greed) and there is only one thing we NEED to do in ADDITION to everything else we do: Put OUR thumb on the other side of the scales of justice.
Judicial Conduct Commission complaints, folks. Bar complaints against support enforcer attorneys. EVERY time they give you cause to file such complaints! Clue: What works are lies, excuse me, "misstatements of fact" ;-), told by attorney to court that were uncorrected and repeated after you asserted that the truth is otherwise. Back it up with evidence. That gets the disciplinary counsel fired up!
Commission on Judicial Conduct new Search page. Look 'em up!
For on line commentary on our judges, there is the Courthouse Forum.
Comment on the OBSCENE UN-AMERICAN Amunrud v. Dep't of Social & Health Services, (2004) 124 Wash. App. 884, 103 P. 3d. 257 decision by the Court of Appeals on December 27, 2004 by Judges William Wayne Baker, Faye Collier Kennedy, and Mary Kay Becker.
Court of Appeals Division Two Commissioner Mark H. Adams was Forced to Resign by the Commission on Judicial Conduct for being weird. The Stipulation. My objection is with respect to the diary he kept at the SUGGESTION OF A COUNSELOR. So much for doctor-patient privilege and medical privacy. Under this circumstance, a judge dare not keep any diary or undergo any treatment for any mental or psychological condition because such cannot be protected from disclosure to the Commission on Judicial Conduct. The inevitable result will be some of our cases being heard by judges whose mental health issues go UNTREATED.
Judges Click here to find the list of Current and Former Judges and their litigation histories.
Under Article IV Section 7 of the Washington Constitution, a party to a case in a superior court has to consent in writing before a pro tem judge (with exceptions) can hear his case or render any decision. If a party objects, the pro tem must recuse.
Pro Tempore Judges Click here to find the list of Current and Former Pro Tempore Judges and their litigation histories.
Mary E. Dicke, WSBA 8264, Gig Harbor, Washington 98335 DOB May 11, 1950 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 King County No. 87-9-10612-3 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $841.05 with 12% interest paid; Pierce County No. 88-2-05990-5 plaintiff civil; Pierce County No. 94-2-02648-3 defendant civil; Pierce County No. 05-2-08798-1 plaintiff civil; Pierce County No. 05-2-08865-1 plaintiff civil; Pierce County No. 84-9-00741-0 judgment creditor paternity for attorney's fees and costs of $1,292.97; Pierce County No. 84-9-01137-9 judgment creditor dissolution for attorney's fees and costs of $1,812.58; Pierce County No. 84-9-02584-1 judgment creditor dissolution for attorney's fees of $150.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-04188-0 judgment creditor dissolution for attorney's fees and costs of $200.00; Pierce County No. 86-9-05734-1 judgment creditor dissolution for attorney's fees and costs of $1,664.71 with interest at 12%; Pierce County No. 89-9-04792-7 judgment creditor civil for attorney's fees and costs of $1,592.23 with interest at 12%; Pierce County No. 95-9-03943-1 judgment creditor domestic for attorney's fees of $500.00;
Meagan Marie Foley, WSBA 9556, Tacoma, Washington 98407 DOB January 18, 1954 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Pierce County No. 85-2-01777-9 defendant tort; Pierce County No. 86-2-06393-1 plaintiff tort motor vehicle; Pierce County No. 87-2-01809-7 plaintiff commercial dismissed by clerk; Pierce County No. 02-2-09305-7 defendant writ of mandamus; Pierce County No. 82-9-02996-4 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-04367-3 or judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with a lien at 12% interest; Pierce County No. 82-9-05974-0 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $750.00; Pierce County No. 83-9-03212-2 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $500.00 paid; Pierce County No. 84-9-03289-9 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $600.00; Pierce County No. 85-9-04842-4 or judgment creditor domestic judgment for $728.65; Pierce County No. 86-9-02763-8 or judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $150.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 95-9-91193-6 judgment debtor tax warrants for $742.09 paid; Pierce County No. 95-9-91693-8 judgment debtor tax warrants for $648.82 judgment vacated;
Mark Lloyd Gelman, WSBA 19163, Spanaway, Washington 98387 DOB October 31, 1959 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Pierce County No. 03-2-06392-0 defendant civil; Pierce County No. 03-2-07065-9 defendant writ of mandamus; Pierce County No. 91-9-05567-1 judgment creditor domestic for attorney's fee of $1,000.00;
Henry Edward Haarmann, WSBA 1574, Gig Harbor, Washington 98335 DOB August 30, 1939 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Landlord, files unlawful detainer cases along with Haarmann & Christianson Builders. Pierce County No. 81-9-04085-4 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $6,000.00; Pierce County No. 83-9-00890-6 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $2,000.00; Pierce County No. 83-9-02251-8 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-00604-9 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $850.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-02001-7 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $1,100.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-02220-6 judgment creditor garnishment enforced for $2,326.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-05017-0 judgment creditor transcript of judgment for $334.45; Pierce County No. 85-9-01612-3 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $6,000.00; Pierce County No. 85-9-02207-7 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $713.78 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 86-9-06007-4 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $200.00; Pierce County No. 87-9-00670-1 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $2,700.00; Pierce County No. 87-9-01450-0 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $350.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 87-9-01972-2 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $250.00; Pierce County No. 87-9-02074-7 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $300.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 88-9-01271-8 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $1,500.00; Pierce County No. 88-9-02223-3 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $2,500.00; Pierce County No. 88-9-02574-7 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $1,000.00 paid; Pierce County No. 89-9-05366-8 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fees of $300.00 against husband; Pierce County No. 90-9-03636-8 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $1,000.00 against husband paid; Pierce County No. 90-9-06627-5 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $152.00 paid; Pierce County No. 90-9-09206-3 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee $100.00 against opposing counsel Herbert Gelman paid; Pierce County No. 91-9-04254-4 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fees of $500.00 against husband; Pierce County No. 93-9-04577-9 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $1,000.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 94-9-02572-5 judgment creditor transcript of judgment for $1,793.00; Pierce County No. 95-9-03843-4 judgment creditor regular civil case along with attorney Marc Tracy Christianson for $12,032.00;
Law Firm of Haarmann and Christianson Pierce County No. 81-9-01204-4 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $3,532.50; Pierce County No. 81-9-03484-6 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $450.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-02738-4 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $920.00;
Haarmann & Christianson Builders Pierce County No. 95-9-03843-4 judgment creditor regular civil case for $12,032.00;
David Harry Johnson, WSBA 2986, Fox Island, Washington 98335 DOB February 7, 1939 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Pierce County No. 81-9-04779-4 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $350.00;
James Michael Marshall, WSBA 7049, University Place, Washington 98466 DOB June 23, 1951 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Did some guardian ad litem work Pierce County No. 81-9-01793-3 judgment creditor paternity with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-03633-2 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's lien for $1,200.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-01553-6 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with guardian ad litem fee of $254.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-05492-2 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $1,000.00 with 10% interest; Pierce County No. 86-9-03210-1 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $350.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 89-9-04454-5 judgment creditor domestic for attorney's fees of $250.00 against husband;
Pro Tempore Court Commissioners Under Article IV Section 7 of the Washington Constitution, a party to a case in a superior court has to consent in writing before a pro tem judge (with exceptions) can hear his case or render any decision. If a party objects, the pro tem must recuse. But commissioners are another kettle of fish. Article IV Section 23 provides for the appointment in each county, by the judge of the superior court within that county, of up to three commissioners, who shall act as judges, subject to review by the judges. I believe, although research is vitally necessary, that an argument can be made that these state constitutional provisions require the recusal of pro tem commissioners if a party to a case before them does not consent to their hearing the case and makes an objection.
Stephen Michael Gaddis, WSBA 1849, white male, Bellevue, Washington 98007 DOB March 15, 1946 Voted on November 8, 2005 Has recently left full time employment as a Commissioner and now serves as a Commissioner Pro Tempore. Been recently disciplined by the Commission on Judicial Conduct. He accepted baseball tickets and other gifts from an attorney who regularly appeared before him in probate cases. I can tell you that in response to my e-mail inquiry, they will not tell me who this attorney is who gave the baseball tickets. Sounds like something that can be found out by asking around. Click here for this correspondence. I have received at least one e-mail from someone who named an attorney. According to the Seattle Times on December 4, 2006 in article written by Cheryl Phillips and Maureen O'Hagan, the attorney who provided the baseball tickets was James Degel. This article also asserts that he improperly sealed 48 guardianship cases since 1990. Was also reprimanded by the Superior Court. Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004. Did some guardian ad litem work. King County No. 80-2-15930-5 claimant civil; King County No. 81-2-18592-4 defendant writs; King County No. 82-2-05097-1 defendant foreclosure; King County No. 83-2-02358-1 defendant foreclosure; King County No. 83-2-06611-5 defendant foreclosure; King County No. 84-2-14044-5 plaintiff unlawful detainer; King County No. 85-2-04014-6 plaintiff civil; King County No. 94-2-10734-8 petitioner civil; King County No. 94-2-11319-4 petitioner civil; King County No. 96-2-23719-1 third party defendant unlawful detainer Vicki Dougan's gold fringe flag argument!; King County No. 02-2-16928-7 defendant injunction with co-defendants Judges Downing, Fox, and Lau, brought by a plaintiff distressed over losing her home to a deed of trust sale, she claimed that a contractual obligation to provide mortgage insurance was breached; ; King County No. 83-9-07220-0 judgment creditor regular civil case mandate from Supreme Court of Washington for costs of $174.00 paid; King County No. 84-9-13120-4 judgment creditor unlawful detainer on default; King County No. 86-9-11920-1 judgment creditor probate for $175,000.00 with 12% interest "reversed"; King County No. 89-9-09656-6 judgment creditor probate with costs of $384.63 with 13.16% interest; King County No. 03-9-38544-7 judgment creditor criminal restitution for $704.59; The probate case is In re Barbara B. Bowers, deceased, King County No. 80-4-02732-5; Becoming curious as to what Commissioner Gaddis' interest is in this dead lady case. Yeah, I know, the 175 grand. But how is he entitled to it, at least before reversal? Might be legit. Can buy a lot of baseball tickets! According to the Seattle Times, he has sealed the file in at least 33 cases since 1990. Now works as a commissioner pro-tem in Pierce County Superior Court.
Crime of Peonage committed by Stephen Michael Gaddis on page 3 he orders the respondent to make 10 job contacts per week in King County No. 05-3-00031-1.
John Miller, WSBA Which one is this one? Could be John Arthur Miller, WSBA 5741, he is the judgment creditor in 5 Pierce County domestic cases where he was not one of the parties but where attorney's fees were awarded.
Former Commissioners
Craig S. Adams, WSBA 7808, Edgewood, Washington 98372 DOB February 12, 1952 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Now legal advisor to the Pierce County Sheriff Did some guardian ad litem work Pierce County No. 072-R (1985) defendant commercial; Pierce County No. 072-U (1985) defendant collection; Pierce County No. 86-2-07373-1 defendant tort dismissed before trial; Pierce County No. 90-2-07078-1 defendant foreclosure default judgment; Pierce County No. 91-2-08022-0 defendant malpractice dismissed; Pierce County No. 01-2-08787-3 defendant foreclosure; Pierce County No. 04-2-09849-7 plaintiff foreclosure; Pierce County No. 81-9-03502-8 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $130.00; Pierce County No. 81-9-03940-6 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $190.00; Pierce County No. 81-9-04499-0 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $350.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-00411-2 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $350.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-01325-1 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $220.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-01613-7 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-01855-5 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $150.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-01967-5 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $250.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-02860-7 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $320.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-02930-1 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-03136-5 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $500.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-04066-6 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $159.50; Pierce County No. 82-9-04067-4 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $286.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-05766-6 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $1,000.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-05923-5 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $500.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-06654-1 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $500.00; Pierce County No. 82-9-06655-0 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $650.00; Pierce County No. 83-9-01741-7 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $800.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-02165-0 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $350.00; Pierce County No. 84-9-05668-2 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $519.65; Pierce County No. 85-9-03835-6 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee and costs of $210.00; Pierce County No. 86-9-01694-6 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $350.00; Pierce County No. 86-9-03575-4 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $350.00; Pierce County No. 86-9-05561-5 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $350.00; Pierce County No. 87-9-03311-3 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $1,500.00; Pierce County No. 89-9-00167-6 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $350.00 paid; Pierce County No. 89-9-04763-3 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $756.00 paid; Pierce County No. 89-9-07022-8 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $600.00; Pierce County No. 90-9-00959-0 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $1,200.00; Pierce County No. 90-9-01587-5 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $250.00; Pierce County No. 90-9-01942-1 judgment creditor domestic decree of modification with attorney's fee of $350.00 with 12% interest; Pierce County No. 90-9-03213-3 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $1,000.00; Pierce County No. 90-9-03229-0 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 90-9-06436-1 judgment creditor domestic with attorney's fee of $500.00 paid; Pierce County No. 91-9-00861-3 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $500.00; Pierce County No. 04-9-09118-8 judgment creditor regular civil case for $34.419.52 amended to $42,677.92 enforced by a writ of execution on real and personal property, something was sold to Craig and Sandra Adams for $20,000.00;
Notice a pattern here? Perhaps the destruction of the institution of marriage and the family is more due to the pecuniary interest of those to whom we award bar licenses and elect to political and judicial office than to two people of the same gender wanting to try it. Phyllis Schafly finally noticed this. She noticed it Again. She opposes reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act as the femi-nazi crap that it is.
Paul Mitchell Boyle, WSBA 1882, Spanaway, Washington 98387 DOB December 15, 1925 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005
John B. Krilich, WSBA 2974 Gone to his hearing before the Angels at the Pearly Gates Pierce County No. 83-2-01985-6 plaintiff foreclosure;
Gerald Allen Horne, WSBA 6123, Elected Prosecutor, Tacoma, Washington 98443 DOB January 4, 1941 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted on September 20, 2005 but not on November 8, 2005 Pierce County No. 01-2-04916-5 defendant civil dismissed and dismissal affirmed on appeal; Pierce County No. 01-2-07539-5 defendant writ of mandamus or prohibition; Pierce County No. 01-2-14747-7 defendant writ of habeas corpus or mandamus dismissed; Pierce County No. 03-2-04474-7 defendant with co-defendant Judges Cohoe, Felnagle, Nelson, Orlando, and Stolz action to vacate void judgment denied denial affirmed on appeal; Pierce County No. 03-2-06879-4 defendant civil decided on summary judgment affirmed on appeal; Pierce County No. 90-3-01993-3 petitioner dissolution; Pierce County No. 97-3-04260-6, petitioner dissolution with no children.
Frannie McNamara Jardine, WSBA 21677, Olympia, Washington 98503 Voted on November 2, 2004 Appears to no longer be registered to vote in the State of Washington Formerly with Lewis County Prosecutor's family support team, Received 90 day suspension on May 5, 2000 for failure to reveal exculpatory evidence to a defendant's attorney during a criminal trial. She was a career guardian ad litem in Tacoma from 1993-1997. Read the Discipline Notice here. Pierce County No. 97-9-11455-2 judgment creditor domestic with guardian ad litem fee and prejudgment interest totaling $571.94; Pierce County No. 98-9-07431-1 judgment creditor domestic with guardian ad litem fee of $900.00 with 12% interest signed by Judge "Cadillac" Grant Anderson; Pierce County No. 01-9-14039-7 judgment creditor domestic with parenting investigator's fee of $350.00; Thurston County No. 02-9-30159-5 judgment creditor paternity for $19,800.00 with 12% interest appears to be for child support, she appears to have had a kid out of wedlock; Why would a prosecutor with a bar license need to receive child support?
As I have said before, Madonna could sue the fathers of her children for child support. If she does not, it is probably because the Material Girl understands the absurdity of the proposition that a wealthy woman needs to receive child support money extorted by the courts to adequately care for her children.
Being stinking rich has its advantages.
Family Support Division Collections Team Located at 949 Court E, Tacoma, Washington 98402
Dennis Wayne Ashman, WSBA 11299, Tacoma, Washington 98406 DOB September 6, 1947 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Did some guardian ad litem work Pierce County No. 88-2-10542-7 plaintiff tort;
Rebecca Randall Disney, WSBA 17777, Fircrest, Washington 98466 DOB March 11, 1943 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Has not voted since Appears to specialize in paternity and contempt actions. The URESA paternity cases are not confidential.
Farah Lillian Emeka, WSBA 31777, Seattle, Washington 98122 DOB April 27, 1976 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005
Jerry Russell Ford, WSBA 12024, Tacoma, Washington 98406-2316 DOB June 17, 1955 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Voted on November 8, 2005
Rebecca A. Fox, WSBA 16603, Vashon Island, Washington 98070 DOB September 23, 1943 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted on March 14, 2006
W. Stephen Gregorich, WSBA 5642, University Place, Washington 98466 DOB December 25, 1945 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Pierce County No. 83-1-01980-1 defendant criminal; Pierce County No. 85-2-01715-9 defendant civil; Pierce County No. 42749 (1976) respondent dissolution;
There is no record in the online databases of Mr. Gregorich being a "judgment debtor criminal". A felony conviction would have disbarred him and a misdemeanor conviction through plea bargain or jury conviction of lesser included charge would not look good. He is still a lawyer. Therefore, chances are, he beat da rap! Congratulations! So why doesn't he work for the criminal defense bar? They saved his ass!
Susan Wills Kirkpatrick, WSBA 14741, Tacoma, Washington 98406 DOB February 3, 1947 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005
Monica Irene Labeck, WSBA 14153, Puyallup, Washington 98374 Does not appear to be registered to vote in the State of Washington.
Patricia Marie Michl, WSBA 17058 Sumner or Bonney Lake or Lake Tapps, Washington 98391 DOB June 5, 1942 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Pierce County No. 86-2-03645-3 non confidential name change was Patricia Marie Milligan;
Lloyd Dixon Oaks, WSBA 21683, Tacoma, Washington 98443 DOB February 23, 1957 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Former United States Army, represents State of Washington in many child support cases. Having sworn or affirmed to defend the United States Constitution against all enemies foreign or domestic, he himself has become an enemy of the Constitution. Done some probate work as guardian ad litem Pierce County No. 95-9-11472-6 judgment creditor paternity with guardian ad litem fee of $150.00; Pierce County No. 97-9-05681-1 judgment creditor domestic decree of dissolution with attorney's fee of $4,000.00; Pierce County No. 98-9-09391-0 judgment creditor domestic child support judgment with attorney's fee and costs of $550.00;
Sarah Evelyn Richardson, WSBA 25084, None of the Sarah E. Richardsons listed as registered to vote are old enough to have been admitted to the WSBA in 1995. Pierce County No. 90-2-03726-1 plaintiff unlawful detainer; Pierce County No. 95-2-10479-2 plaintiff domestic violence; Pierce County No. 02-2-01374-6 respondent domestic violence; Pierce County No. 91-3-03369-1 petitioner dissolution with children parenting plan was litigated from 1991 through 1998; Pierce County No. 90-9-02856-6 judgment creditor default judgment for $1,818.00; Pierce County No. 96-9-02146-7 judgment creditor domestic her own divorce for $$800.00 with 12% interest paid; Pierce County No. 97-9-11639-3 judgment debtor domestic her own divorce for $433.36; Pierce County No. 97-9-11640-7 her own divorce husband is judgment debtor to a Tracy Burgess; Pierce County No. 99-9-08136-7 judgment debtor to Pacific Lutheran University for $2,524.95 with 12% interest;
James Barry Roche, WSBA 7289, Puyallup, Washington 98374 DOB January 28, 1949 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Seems to be more into representing the Division of Child Support as "involved party" in domestic relations cases filed by couples where someone signed up for welfare. However, he will file cases for modification of existing orders and for contempt, all members of this outfit do. Pierce County No. 94-2-03060-0 defendant injunction denied an dismissed; Pierce County No. 84-3-02621-8 involved party dissolution;
Elizabeth Tyrrell Vincent, WSBA 25048, Tacoma, Washington 98406 DOB December 18, 1963 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Has not voted since Pierce County No. 03-9-05503-5 judgment debtor paternity for $857.99 payable to the alleged father must for costs and fees or something;
Allen Webster Wah-Ho Tom, WSBA 14201, Olympia, Washington 98501 DOB August 13, 1952 Voted on November 2, 2004 Voted on February 7, 2006 Previously worked in the Thurston County Prosecutor's Family Support Division. Thurston County No. 80-3-00185-1 involved party child custody; Thurston County No. 88-3-00124-4 involved party dissolution with children; Thurston County No. 91-3-00603-3 involved party dissolution with children; Thurston County No. 00-9-30319-2 judgment creditor domestic attorney's lien for $1,356.27;
Karen Anne Watson, WSBA 24259, Fircrest, Washington 98466-6901 DOB April 3, 1963 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005
Catherine Marjorie Whitted, WSBA 17028, Gig Harbor, Washington 98335 DOB May 3, 1954 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Pierce County No. 89-2-09249-8 plaintiff personal injury;
Other Deputy Prosecutors
Dione Joy Ludlow, WSBA 25104, Puyallup, Washington 98373 DOB November 7, 1968 Voted on November 2, 2004 Has not voted since. Formerly a deputy prosecutor with Mason County
Former Family Support Deputy Prosecutors
Shari Anne Leid, WSBA 25091, Seattle, Washington 98118 DOB December 16, 1969 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Did some guardian ad litem work Pierce County No. 98-3-03972-9 involved party.
Robin Danean Sabronsky, married, became Robin Danean Korte, WSBA 25868, moved to El Dorado Hills, California 95762 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 No longer registered to vote in the State of Washington.
Patricia H. Trowbridge, WSBA 15209, resigned from the bar, Tacoma, Washington 98407-6244 DOB November 5, 1930 Voted by absentee on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005
Sherry M. Wilson, WSBA 17594, P.O. Box 2174, Eureka Springs, Arkansas 72632-2174
Pierce County List of Certified Guardians ad Litem 11.88
Pierce County List of Certified Guardians ad Litem 26.09 Note: Bill Harrington, a non-attorney, is on this list. He has been friendly to the fathers' side of these issues in the past. We have been good friends.
Sheriff Paul A. Pastor, Jr., Lakewood, Washington 98498 DOB April 2, 1949 Voted at poll on November 2, 2004 Voted again on November 8, 2005 Pierce County No. 01-2-10025-0 defendant commercial; Pierce County No. 02-2-05270-9 defendant civil dismissed by clerk; Pierce County No. 02-2-05625-9 defendant personal injury apparently settled sheriff and deputies flagged for unnecessary roughness; Pierce County No. 02-2-06171-6 defendant civil with lots of do-defendants dismissed without prejudice; Pierce County No. 04-2-03768-4 plaintiff writ of review against civil service commission dismissed before trial; Pierce County No. 04-2-05830-4 defendant personal injury decided by summary judgment; Pierce County No. 04-2-07032-1 defendant personal injury;
Deputy Sheriffs who have arrested parents on child support warrants
Detective John William Sample, Bonney Lake, Washington 98390 DOB September 1, 1960 Voted on November 7, 2000 Has not voted since Voter registration currently "Inactive". Pierce County No. 95-2-09345-6 defendant domestic violence dismissed; Pierce County No. 04-2-03524-0 plaintiff domestic violence denied; Pierce County No. 03-3-01681-0 dissolution with children.
Perjury and interference with official proceedings are set forth in chapter 9A.72 RCW and resisting arrest and obstructing governmental operations are set forth in chapter 9A.76 RCW.
Feel free to e-mail me at rogerwknight@hotmail.com with any information that you have to share.
If the back button does not take you there, click Home to go to the Index page of this Antipeonage Act Website, click Enemies for the main Enemies page, click Letters for the Letters page, click Allies for the Allies page, or click Justice Files to get to the Justice Files Home page. Or you can use the Antipeonage Act Site Map.
