Indiana Enemies
For their sponsorship of Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox Sucker's www.paykids.com his Paykids Foundation, boycott the listed sponsors, including Art Van Furniture, Meijer Stores, Michigan State Medical Society (warning, the MSMS website does not like to let you out when you click the back button), SBC Communications, and Michigan Health and Hospital Association and tell them why you are boycotting them! Go to the Michigan Enemies of Freedom Page and read letters by Stan Rains and Terry Lear for more information as to why, and read Domino's Pizza, Inc.'s letter to me in response to my concerns about PayKid's use of Domino's Pizza gift certificates as a prize in their loathsome Billboard contest, which was CANCELLED!!
Not to be outdone, we are announcing our own billboard contest!
The Family and Social Services Administration Bureau of Child Support runs the peonage system in the Hoosier state. It directs people to ask questions concerning child support to the county prosecutors and the county offices of the Division of Family and Children.
The Marion County Prosecutor operates his own Child Support Division.
Title 31 Family Law and Juvenile Law
Article 12 Domestic Relations Courts
Article 13 Parent-Child Relationship
Article 15 Divorce and Legal Separation
Article 16 Support of Children and Other Legal Dependents
Article 17 Custody and Visitation Rights
Article 18 Uniform Interstate Family Support Act
Title 33 Courts and Court Officers
Article 12 Prohibited Causes of Action
Chapter 2 Certain Domestic Relations Actions, IC 34-12-2
Chapter 3 Certain Legal Actions Involving Firearms Manufacturers and Sellers, IC 34-12-3
Title 35 Criminal Code and Procedure
Article 46 Miscellaneous Offenses
Chapter 1 Offenses Against the Family, IC 35-46-1 IC 35-46-1-5 Nonsupport of a dependent child is declared null and void as peonage by 42 U.S.C. §1994 in the case where the crime is defined by failure to comply with a court order with respect to a child not in the custody of the parent. IC 35-46-1-6 Nonsupport of spouse in need of support. This statute does not appear to clearly indicate whether violation of an alimony or maintenance order would be a crime, however any such application to an alimony order is declared null and void as peonage by 42 U.S.C. §1994. IC 35-46-1-7 Nonsupport of a parent in need of support. This statute does not appear to clearly indicate whether violation of a court order requiring support of a parent would be a crime, however any such application to such court order is declared null and void as peonage by 42 U.S.C. §1994.
Article 49 Obscenity and Pornography
Chapter 3 Crime of Obscenity, IC 35-46-1-3
Article I Section 1 of the Indiana Constitution declares that all people are created equal, endowed with inalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Such rights, of course, are forfeited upon loss of custody of child.
Article I Section 9 of the Indiana Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and that all persons have the right to speak, write or print freely, on any subject whatsoever. However, some subjects are not within the phrase "any subject whatsoever".
Article I Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Article I Section 12 of the Indiana Constitution provides that all courts shall be open, and every person, for injury done to him in his person, property, or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law. Justice shall be administered freely, and without purchase; completely, and without denial; speedily, and without delay. Does not apply, of course, to family law.
Article I Section 16 of the Indiana Constitution prohibits excessive fines and bails and cruel and unusual punishments. Just not excessive child support and no punishment for failure to pay such can be deemed cruel and unusual.
Article I Section 22 of the Indiana Constitution prohibits imprisonment for debt, except in cases of fraud. I guess child support is a fraud, and alimony (see below) is not.
Article I Section 32 of the Indiana Constitution declares the right of the people to keep and bear arms, in defense of themselves and of the state.
Article I Section 37 of the Indiana Constitution prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude. Except in cases of family law.
Schultz v. Marion Superior Court, (Ind. 1974) 307 N.E. 2d. 53 found that contempt for alimony was prohibited imprisonment for debt, overruling Libertowski v. Hojara, (1967) 228 N.E. 2d. 422.
Installment judgments and imprisonment for debt, Risk v. Thomson, (Ind. 1958) 147 N. E. 2d. 540.
Feel free to e-mail me at rogerwknight@hotmail.com with any information that you have to share.
If the back button does not take you there, click Home to go to the Index page of this Antipeonage Act Website, click Enemies for the main Enemies page, click Letters for the Letters page, and click Allies for the Allies page. Or you can use the Antipeonage Act Site Map.